I’ve got opinions about the World Cup, as usual, which starts tomorrow. The winners will probably be Brazil; Germany, Spain, Italy and perhaps Portugal and Argentina will be other close contenders.
No African team will survive the group stages (Ivory Coast, the continent’s best hopes, are in a hellishly tough group), while England will crash out in the quarter-finals on penalties.
But I’m struggling to get enthusiastic about it – as is now becoming sadly normal, Scotland are not there. Call me parochial, and I know it’s a four-yearly football spectacle with no rival, but without a home team to cheer on there’s little to keep me interested.
It’s like domestic football – the English league just can’t arouse any interest in me, and the Scottish league – rubbish though it often is – has a more authentic, human relevance to it.
Not only are there unlikely to be changes to the established order of leading teams at the World Cup, who remain a good distance ahead of the rest, but there are too few little teams there to add interest. Honduras are about as fresh as it gets, and my usual default of “really nice countries I’ve been to” would throw up only Australia or New Zealand, neither of whom by themselves make me want to throw myself headlong into following the tournament. Of course I’ve been to and loved many other countries, but the USA are unsupportable until they call football by its proper name and stop playing sports that only they play, I have no interest in supporting England, and my fond memories of places like Slovenia and Slovakia are somewhat waning over time.
There is, of course, North Korea, that great parody of a dictatorship who are so wacky they’re more comical than sinister, and it will be interesting to see how they cope in their first World Cup appearance in forty-four years; and how many of their players take the opportunity to defect. It’s almost tempting to support them, but that would be more glib more than anything else.
But above all, not having a TV is a good reason not to watch. No doubt there’ll be some matches online and I could watch them in pubs, but without Scotland it’s doubtful I’ll make any particular effort to track what’s going on in South Africa.
Of course, the group stages could be astonishingly packed with drama, shocks and breathtaking performances, and I’ll belatedly throw myself behind whatever fashionable, headline-making team emerges.
Somehow, though, I doubt it.
But as a final thought – this is very, very cool: a brilliant interactive World Cup calendar.
Oh awesome. I just realised England’s daytime group match is on my day off.
Also, the group stages usually are very good. It’s the knockouts that can turn out very dull indeed. Japan/Korea 2002 was a particularly marked example of this.
Stop being a miserable sod Varwell, it’s the World Cup!
North Korea, eh? Let’s see: they’ve been drawn in the same group as Brazil, they have no chance of getting to the second round, their supporters have probably been brain-washed into believing they’ll win the whole thing, and they live in the sporting shadow of their neighbours to the south, despite the fact that they’ve only actually had one decent tournament when they played all of their matches at home and benefited from some dodgy refereeing decisions. Sounds like the perfect team for Scotland fans to adopt.
Mind you, North Korean fans are probably still banging on about how well they did in 1966, so perhaps not…